<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding photography pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/</link>
	<description>Portfolio and Tutorials by Rob Miracle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I would have, in no case ever, given up rights to the photo.  That&#039;s just not what I&#039;m interested in.  I am, however, not in the photo business (anymore) so I have that luxury.

That&#039;s said, depending on use, I have no qualms about giving away shots (limited or one-time use) for free or for trivial amounts (yes $100 is a trivial amount).  I&#039;ve had several of my Flickr photos used -- with my permission and my attribution -- by various online sites for free.  Meh, I figure, those are mostly (relatively) low traffic sites that may not be here next year.

Now, as you point out, a book cover is a different thing.  Yes, they did have a $3000 budget and you did the right thing by telling them to pay up or hit the road.

I&#039;d have offered them a non-exclusive rate in the $600-$1000 range (with attribution) and not cared a whit if they accepted or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have, in no case ever, given up rights to the photo.  That&#8217;s just not what I&#8217;m interested in.  I am, however, not in the photo business (anymore) so I have that luxury.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s said, depending on use, I have no qualms about giving away shots (limited or one-time use) for free or for trivial amounts (yes $100 is a trivial amount).  I&#8217;ve had several of my Flickr photos used &#8212; with my permission and my attribution &#8212; by various online sites for free.  Meh, I figure, those are mostly (relatively) low traffic sites that may not be here next year.</p>
<p>Now, as you point out, a book cover is a different thing.  Yes, they did have a $3000 budget and you did the right thing by telling them to pay up or hit the road.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have offered them a non-exclusive rate in the $600-$1000 range (with attribution) and not cared a whit if they accepted or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-462</guid>
		<description>Rob, great explanation and example, my friend.  I would not have expected you to do otherwise - you have always maintained your integrity the whole time I have known you.  It&#039;s hard sometimes for others (spouses, etc) to understand such things but she knows who you are and loves you for it so it&#039;s all good.

I would do the same thing you did, but I am sure my &quot;break-point&quot; would be much lower than yours, but that&#039;s about right because the quality of my shots are mech lower than yours. :)

One thing to always remember, amigo, GKMF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, great explanation and example, my friend.  I would not have expected you to do otherwise &#8211; you have always maintained your integrity the whole time I have known you.  It&#8217;s hard sometimes for others (spouses, etc) to understand such things but she knows who you are and loves you for it so it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>I would do the same thing you did, but I am sure my &#8220;break-point&#8221; would be much lower than yours, but that&#8217;s about right because the quality of my shots are mech lower than yours. <img src='http://www.robmiracle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One thing to always remember, amigo, GKMF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I would have, in no case ever, given up rights to the photo.  That&#039;s just not what I&#039;m interested in.  I am, however, not in the photo business (anymore) so I have that luxury.

That&#039;s said, depending on use, I have no qualms about giving away shots (limited or one-time use) for free or for trivial amounts (yes $100 is a trivial amount).  I&#039;ve had several of my Flickr photos used -- with my permission and my attribution -- by various online sites for free.  Meh, I figure, those are mostly (relatively) low traffic sites that may not be here next year.

Now, as you point out, a book cover is a different thing.  Yes, they did have a $3000 budget and you did the right thing by telling them to pay up or hit the road.

I&#039;d have offered them a non-exclusive rate in the $600-$1000 range (with attribution) and not cared a whit if they accepted or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have, in no case ever, given up rights to the photo.  That&#8217;s just not what I&#8217;m interested in.  I am, however, not in the photo business (anymore) so I have that luxury.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s said, depending on use, I have no qualms about giving away shots (limited or one-time use) for free or for trivial amounts (yes $100 is a trivial amount).  I&#8217;ve had several of my Flickr photos used &#8212; with my permission and my attribution &#8212; by various online sites for free.  Meh, I figure, those are mostly (relatively) low traffic sites that may not be here next year.</p>
<p>Now, as you point out, a book cover is a different thing.  Yes, they did have a $3000 budget and you did the right thing by telling them to pay up or hit the road.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have offered them a non-exclusive rate in the $600-$1000 range (with attribution) and not cared a whit if they accepted or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Excellent information.  i would add integrity to your list even though it does not start with a t.   the seller needs to keep theirs and the buyer needs to improve theirs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent information.  i would add integrity to your list even though it does not start with a t.   the seller needs to keep theirs and the buyer needs to improve theirs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Great article Rob - thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Rob &#8211; thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Hi Linda, this has inspired me to write a part 2 of this (pricing from the buyer&#039;s side..) which I will try to do today.  But the short answer is the three-Tee&#039;s:  Time, Talent and Taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linda, this has inspired me to write a part 2 of this (pricing from the buyer&#8217;s side..) which I will try to do today.  But the short answer is the three-Tee&#8217;s:  Time, Talent and Taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.robmiracle.com/2009/08/22/understanding-photography-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmiracle.com/?p=476#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Can you explain why buying prints after a pro photo shoot is so expensive? I feel like I already paid an arm for the shooting time, and the prints cost two legs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you explain why buying prints after a pro photo shoot is so expensive? I feel like I already paid an arm for the shooting time, and the prints cost two legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
